I don’t really know how to start reviewing this book. It’s a book which will open your minds. It’s a work which will improve your debates. It’s a text which will provoke and inspire both men and women.
De Beauvoir believes that woman’s inferiority in society is a result not of natural differences but of differences in the upbringing of man and woman. Male domination is not inherent or fated but conditioned at every stage of development. She uses the words, “Man learns his power.” By the same token, woman is not born passive, mediocre, or immanent. Rather, she is socialized to believe that proper women must embody these characteristics and, subtly and not subtly, she is conditioned to believe that denying her true self is the only way to achieve happiness and gain acceptance.
Biology has been well discussed in her work. A woman’s reproductive capacity should not stop her from fulfilling a position in society beyond the home. Woman is neither exclusively a worker nor exclusively a womb. Right through history, woman has been enslaved to her reproductive function. Her life to the present has been an uninterrupted succession of pregnancies, and her contributions to society have been restricted to her womb. Woman cannot be incorporate in a workplace, for she must still juggle the burdens of childbearing and childrearing, an impossible task for even the most energetic mothers. For woman to achieve more than liberation and enter the workplace as man’s equal, the nuclear family must be changed so that she is able to leave the home. Social stigmas against unwed mothers and abortion must be lifted to allow woman to take charge of her own pregnancies and control her own life.
De Beauvoir challenges “the eternal feminine,” or that “vague and basic essence, femininity.” This myth takes many forms—the sanctity of the mother, the purity of the virgin, the fecundity of the earth and of the womb—but in all cases serves to deny women’s individuality and trap them inside ideals. She pointed out that just as there is no such thing as the “eternal masculine,” there is no such thing as “eternal feminine”.
De Beauvoir uses the term Other throughout The Second Sex to diagnose the female’s secondary position in society as well as within her thoughts. Throughout human history, a woman has value as a sexual partner but not as an independent entity. She completes him, but she herself is incomplete.
Brilliant review. I haven’t read the book myself, but now I have a good idea. Personally, I feel that glorification of the martyrdom of women is the greatest hindrance in our progress. We are always asked to thank our mothers for sacrificing, which is a way of encouraging all women to follow the same behavior. We don’t have to thank them, we have to stop them from sacrificing their time, their priorities, their dreams. And we can start by teaching our daughters to not take any shit from anybody, just as we teach our sons.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is another point of view you have added to my mind – that we should not be encouraging sacrifices of women. Thank you, Navanwita! And yes, you should read this book.
LikeLike